<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fantasy &amp; Science Fiction July 06 &#8211; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjd.joskinandlob.com/wordpress/writings/fantasy-science-fiction-july-06-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjd.joskinandlob.com/wordpress/writings/fantasy-science-fiction-july-06-review</link>
	<description>Mad Ramblings of Michael J. DeLuca</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:39:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Howell</title>
		<link>http://mjd.joskinandlob.com/wordpress/writings/fantasy-science-fiction-july-06-review/comment-page-1#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 05:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjd.joskinandlob.com/wordpress/?p=98#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review. I haven&#039;t checked out this issue yet. &quot;The Meaning of Luff&quot; by Matthew Hughes sounds interesting. It&#039;s too bad it takes a couple pages to rev up. I&#039;ve been reading some Jack Vance and he has the same problem. But once it gets going it&#039;s some real unique stuff I think you&#039;d enjoy. Nice of you to write such a detailed review in exchange for the free copy. I also don&#039;t have a subscription, because I&#039;ve found the magazine rather uneven, but perhaps I&#039;m just fickle. I look forward to your additional -- and I&#039;m sure penultimate -- thoughts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review. I haven&#8217;t checked out this issue yet. &#8220;The Meaning of Luff&#8221; by Matthew Hughes sounds interesting. It&#8217;s too bad it takes a couple pages to rev up. I&#8217;ve been reading some Jack Vance and he has the same problem. But once it gets going it&#8217;s some real unique stuff I think you&#8217;d enjoy. Nice of you to write such a detailed review in exchange for the free copy. I also don&#8217;t have a subscription, because I&#8217;ve found the magazine rather uneven, but perhaps I&#8217;m just fickle. I look forward to your additional &#8212; and I&#8217;m sure penultimate &#8212; thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
